BORN THIS WAY ALLIANCE

Love, Peace, and Equality<3
THE SCARF OF SEXUAL PREFERENCE
{ wear }

Jun 1 '12

1,883 notes (via thingsgoodandgreen & wildearth)

Jun 1 '12
thedailywhat:

Breaking DOMA News of the Day: In a victory for gay marriage advocates that rivals the enormity of Proposition 8 in California, the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in Boston today upheld a lower court’s ruling and declared the federal Defense of Marriage Act unconsitutional.
From the court’s opinion:

“[M]any Americans believe that marriage is the union of a man and a woman, and most Americans live in states where that is the law today. One virtue of federalism is that it permits this diversity of governance based on local choice, but this applies as well to the states that have chosen to legalize same-sex marriage. Under current Supreme Court authority, Congress’ denial of federal benefits to same-sex couples lawfully married in Massachusetts has not been adequately supported by any permissible federal interest.”

Expect the ruling to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
[politico]

thedailywhat:

Breaking DOMA News of the Day: In a victory for gay marriage advocates that rivals the enormity of Proposition 8 in California, the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in Boston today upheld a lower court’s ruling and declared the federal Defense of Marriage Act unconsitutional.

From the court’s opinion:

“[M]any Americans believe that marriage is the union of a man and a woman, and most Americans live in states where that is the law today. One virtue of federalism is that it permits this diversity of governance based on local choice, but this applies as well to the states that have chosen to legalize same-sex marriage. Under current Supreme Court authority, Congress’ denial of federal benefits to same-sex couples lawfully married in Massachusetts has not been adequately supported by any permissible federal interest.”

Expect the ruling to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

[politico]

1,868 notes (via thedailywhat)

Jun 1 '12
reuters:

A federal appeals court in Boston found on Thursday that a U.S. law defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman unconstitutionally denies federal benefits to lawfully married same-sex couples in a ruling that promises to push the issue of gay marriage to the U.S. Supreme Court. 
The ruling on the 1996 law, the Defense of Marriage Act, marked a victory for gay rights groups and U.S. President Barack Obama, whose administration announced last year it considered the law unconstitutional and would no longer defend it.
READ MORE: Court says marriage law discriminates against gay couples 

reuters:

A federal appeals court in Boston found on Thursday that a U.S. law defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman unconstitutionally denies federal benefits to lawfully married same-sex couples in a ruling that promises to push the issue of gay marriage to the U.S. Supreme Court. 

The ruling on the 1996 law, the Defense of Marriage Act, marked a victory for gay rights groups and U.S. President Barack Obama, whose administration announced last year it considered the law unconstitutional and would no longer defend it.

READ MORE: Court says marriage law discriminates against gay couples 

268 notes (via reuters)

May 31 '12

172 notes (via homopride & quotethattalk)

May 31 '12
An appeals court ruled Thursday that the heart of a law that denies a host of federal benefits to gay married couples is unconstitutional.

17 notes (via pflagmom)

May 31 '12

123 notes (via gaywrites)

May 29 '12

7 notes (via projectqueer & ryansallans)

May 29 '12

884 notes (via thetrevorproject & queercandy)

May 29 '12

9,652 notes (via gay-men & male-pride)

May 29 '12
wewontsink:

them0nsterinside:

stopgirlhate:

ethicsinadvertising:

greenactivista:

ragingsocialist:

socio-huxley-campus-trash:

chubbybunnieez:

This is so rude.

“Hey, don’t hate on all ads, some are pretty cool right?”“Oh, yeah, just look at this one- no wait, this is fucking shameful too.”

Well at least they’re not trying to be all subtle about what they’re trying to brainwash you into thinking anymore.

Magazines and advertisements are bullies too.

Wow this is some fucked up advertising.
Intentionally trying to lower someone’s self-esteem to buy something.
Think about how many already self-conscious teens are going to see this and cry.

Well, aren’t all make-up products intentionally trying to lower women’s self esteem to get them to buy products? Fade those wrinkles! Even out your skin tone! You need our products to cover up because you are repulsive as you are! 

This is repulsive.  Fuck advertising, fuck Pro Activ, fuck these bullshit companies that prey on societal expectations.

SHUT UP THIS IS HILARIOUS IM SURE YOU ALL RAN OUT AND BOUGHT IT IMMEDIATELY!

wewontsink:

them0nsterinside:

stopgirlhate:

ethicsinadvertising:

greenactivista:

ragingsocialist:

socio-huxley-campus-trash:

chubbybunnieez:

This is so rude.

“Hey, don’t hate on all ads, some are pretty cool right?”
“Oh, yeah, just look at this one- no wait, this is fucking shameful too.”

Well at least they’re not trying to be all subtle about what they’re trying to brainwash you into thinking anymore.

Magazines and advertisements are bullies too.

Wow this is some fucked up advertising.

Intentionally trying to lower someone’s self-esteem to buy something.

Think about how many already self-conscious teens are going to see this and cry.

Well, aren’t all make-up products intentionally trying to lower women’s self esteem to get them to buy products? Fade those wrinkles! Even out your skin tone! You need our products to cover up because you are repulsive as you are! 

This is repulsive.  Fuck advertising, fuck Pro Activ, fuck these bullshit companies that prey on societal expectations.

SHUT UP THIS IS HILARIOUS IM SURE YOU ALL RAN OUT AND BOUGHT IT IMMEDIATELY!

(Source: imscaredofbutterflys)

41 notes (via wewontsink & imscaredofbutterflys)